Wednesday, September 1, 2010

Eat Local Challenge 2010


The Eat Local Challenge begins today in Milwaukee--everywhere, people will be seeking out their local farms, markets, gardens, and restaurants for sustenance. To celebrate this fourth year of an increasingly successful challenge, I thought I'd share some local food menu ideas I put together for the 2007 challenge...people are always asking me for menu suggestions.  Also, you can scroll down to watch yesterday's television spot on Fox 6 where I try to make some connections between eating locally and eating healthfully...

Eat Local Challenge Menu Suggestions
September in Southeastern Wisconsin presents us with the opportunity to choose from a wide array of beautiful locally grown & made foods. The harvest is in full swing & so it becomes easier than one might expect to “eat local”. I’ve compiled some menu ideas to help celebrate the season in a nutritionally balanced way (i.e.; not eating solely tomatoes for a week). Suggested foods range from home-grown to locally-produced and rely heavily upon our local farmers’ bounty. There are a few ideas for those who want to go “100% local” as well as for those who are interested in exploring the idea, but are constrained by time or taste.
Just the main ingredients are listed; the seasonings & techniques are up to you. I’ve assumed use of butter over oil (unless you decide to purchase Wisconsin made pumpkin seed oil or use what’s already in your pantry) and creative use of brightly flavored dairy products like plain yogurt, blue cheeses, sour cream over vinegars & lemons (unless you can find locally made apple cider vinegar), along with heaps of fresh herbs to provide the major flavors. I’ve included some sourcing information at the end. This is in no way a comprehensive list, but one to build upon. Enjoy the challenge…
                                                                                   - Jennifer Casey, Sep 2007
 
Breakfast
Omelet with Feta Cheese, Tomatoes, & Herbs
Breakfast Red Potatoes
Sliced Watermelon
Milk

Whole Grain Toast with Butter (Apple, Maple, or Cream Butter)
Yogurt sweetened with Maple Syrup
McIntosh Apple
Fair trade, Locally roasted Coffee with Honey & Cream

Locally baked Breakfast Pastry
Homemade Crepes stuffed with Ricotta & Sautéed Pears
Sparkling Apple Wine

Apple Pancakes
Sliced Cantaloupe
Cornmeal-Apple Porridge
Yogurt, Plum, & Granola Parfait

Lunch
Simple Soyman Burger on Whole Grain Bun with Arugula & Tomato
Potato & Scallion Salad

Pita pockets spread with Herb Cream Cheese & stuffed with Sprouts & Bell Pepper
Sliced Carrots & Apple
Yogurt

Chicken & Wild Rice Salad with Broiled Fennel
Grilled Cheddar Cheese & Heirloom Tomato-Basil Sandwich
Mixed Green Salad

Egg Salad & sliced Cucumber Sandwich
Watercress Salad

Toasted Summer Sausage, Button Mushroom, & Gruyere Sandwich
Spinach Salad

Cauliflower Asiago Quiche
Tomato, Basil, Fresh Mozzarella Salad

Dinner
Grass-fed Beef Filet topped with Caramelized Onions
Mashed Potatoes with Rosemary
Sautéed Swiss Chard
Apple Pie
Stone’s Throw Pinot Noir

Creamy Polenta topped with Tomato-Garlic Salad
Pan-seared Chicken wit Thyme & Garlic
Sautéed Onions, Bell Peppers, & Fennel
Honeyed Melon with Mascarpone

Chicken Bratwurst
Sweet Corn
Grilled Zucchini & Eggplant
Blue Cheese & Chive Potato Salad
New Glarus Fat Squirrel Ale

Roasted Butternut Squash or Pumpkin with Sage
Wild “Fried” Rice with Eggs & Scallions
Fresh Shelled Pinto Beans & Green Beans

Pan-seared Brown Trout
Roasted Root Vegetables (Beets, Sweet Potatoes, Red Potatoes, &/or Parsnips)
Green Salad with Goat Chevre & Shaved Fennel

Selection of Wisconsin Cheeses
Wild Grapes, Apples, Pears, &/or Ever Bearing Strawberries
Baked Garlic
Potter’s Crackers

Farmers’ Market Soup
possibly made of
Onions, Celery, Carrots, Garlic,
Potatoes, Tomatoes, Swiss Chard, & Herbs


 

Sunday, August 29, 2010

ocean's decline



When a friend recently told me about a new report out showing that phytoplankton, the source of much of the world's oxygen and which stands at the very base of much of the planet's food chain, has declined by forty percent since 1950, I was shocked.  Jaw droppingly shocked.  Oh my.  This is big news.  Phytoplankton makes the world go around. The reason for the decline, scientists say, is global warming.  You can read about the research in this Nature news piece,  "Ocean greenery under warming stress, A century of phytoplankton decline suggests that ocean ecosystems are in peril."

(Closer to home we've seen what happens when plankton is depleted.  When invasive zebra mussels depleted Lake Michigan's plankton supply, native perch, much beloved for its starring role in Friday fish fries, drastically declined.  Local outdoors writer, Paul Smith, wrote about the 90% reduction in Lake Michigan perch in less than twenty years in this Journal Sentinel article.)

This phytoplankton research adds to what we already know about the precarious state of sea life. Earlier this summer, we learned about the massive worldwide decline of the much beloved, warm blooded, blue fin tuna population in an epic New York Times Magazine piece by Paul Greenberg titled "Tuna's End."   Blue fin tuna is one among many species that are over-fished world wide.  Pair that with suboptimal ocean habitat, due to ocean acidification and ruination of breeding grounds due to industrial fishing practices and pollution, and we can expect to soon see the end of the "Age of Tuna."  Many groups are calling for a complete moratorium on blue fin tuna fishing.

What's an eater to do?  Of course we know the health benefits of seafood, especially those with flesh rich in omega 3 fatty acids, such as wild salmon and tuna.  (It's interesting to me to note that within the sea-food-chain, the omega 3's in fish originate in phytoplankton.)  I explored this issue back in 2008 in the blogpost "Finding Sustainable Seafood."  That post identifies some options for non-marine sources of dietary omega-3s and includes a link to a sustainable seafood selector tool.  Here's another great resource:

Quick Tips from the Sustainable Seafood Guide on the NRDC website.
Eat lower on the food chain
Buy American
Buy wild
Eat local
Buy from trusted retailers
Ask where your fish came from
Look for the blue, Marine Stewardship Council sticker




Sustainable Nutrition Bottom-line:  Obviously, global warming must be halted if we hope to allay the very worst effects of ocean acidification and species decline.  As eaters, we can choose to follow a low-carbon diet and to think carefully about our seafood choices.  We do have power in the food choices we make everyday.  Our appetites shape the world.

Saturday, July 31, 2010

Procuring Nourishment


A trip to the farmer's market this morning, and an afternoon spent in the garden yesterday, left me musing about the procurement of food. The word procure, comes from the Latin term procurare, meanings, "to take care of."  Pro = for + cura = care.  Just how much care do we, en masse, spend in obtaining our food?

Farmer's market shoppers with reusable bags brimming with gorgeous produce aside, I see evidence all around of just how little time, thought, or care goes into to how, why, and when people get something to fill their bellies or quench their thirst.  The good food movement is on the upswing, but most Americans remain out of touch with the source of their nourishment.

Once upon a time humans spent a great deal of time and care feeding themselves.  Now we leave it up to a small handful of very powerful food corporations (which bring us factory made burgers and industrial grade sweeteners) to do it for us.  In the neighborhood in which I work, as I walk to our health center's community garden plot, I find garbage cans and sidewalks littered with fast food wrappers and empty sweetened beverage containers and people guzzling high fructose corn syrup like it's going out of style.  Not to point fingers.  Federal policies and corporate campaigns have led to these easily obtainable, cheap, processed foodstuffs.  Each convenience store and gas station I walk past proudly announces they accept food stamps inside.  Peering down the aisles of these stores, I find little that would qualify as healthy options.  You know this scene.

Ironically, or maybe tragically, only two farmer's markets in the Milwaukee metro area currently accept food stamps.  There does exist the Farmer's Market Nutrition Program for seniors and WIC participants, but the elders I know who signed up for the SFMNP came home with a $25 coupon for the season.  Twenty five dollars won't get people their recommended daily servings of vegetables for an entire season, maybe not even an entire week.  Why is it, I keep asking myself, do we subsidize cheap food on the agricultural level with corn and soybean subsidies?  (see Gov Ag Policies and Obesity.)  Wouldn't the sane thing to do, from a public health perspective, be to make it as easy as possible for all people to get the foods that help to prevent and control obesity, diabetes, heart disease, and such?

Bottomline: The change we so drastically need to make in our food system can't just come from the top down in the shape of smarter food assistance & subsidy policies; it must come from individuals and communities as well.  This is why local groups such as the Victory Garden Initiative, Growing Power, Walnut Way, and even our little Circle Garden project are so important--because it is these initiatives that teach people to be more self sufficient by growing nutritious food...to take more care in finding something to eat.

Tuesday, July 6, 2010

Gov Ag Policies and Obesity


Just what do government agricultural policies have to do with obesity? 
It seems, to me, a short jump from current government ag subsidies to our toxic, obesogenic and diabetogenic food environment.  If we are what we eat and we eat what’s available and what’s available is what we grow a lot of (read: subsidized corn and soy) and what’s not available is a lot of whole plant foods (read: unsubsidized vegetables) then we end up eating a lot of the easily accessible, cheap, processed junk.  But we know this. 
Maybe the thing to ask ourselves is, “why are we eating a lot of cheap junk?”  Is it because we are human and born with a sweet tooth and are wired to eat whenever able?  I think so. Yes. In part.  Eating past our current caloric needs is evolutionarily ingrained.  It wasn’t until very recently in history when humans had more than enough to eat.  “Feasting” was protective for the once commonplace times of “famine”.   We can blame it on our genes.  But not completely.  Because the genes for problems like Type 2 Diabetes and Obesity are really only expressed when the environment promotes it.  It also wasn’t until very recently in human history that we had twin epidemics of diabetes and obesity.  Take home point: when we flood the market with consumable junk, we consume it. 
In light of this dynamic, I found it interesting to read, on the same day, one article about how the USDA has agreed that a soda tax would help combat obesity, and another article about how the USDA is entrenched in subsidies (which prompt cheap soda.)
In the American Prospect article “Slowed Food Revolution” author Heather Rodgers does a great job explaining why organic/sustainable food costs more, why small farmers aren’t able to make a living, and exploring why our policy makers in Washington are opposed to change.
One of the salient points she makes is that the USDA is trying to support organic while not altering support for industrialed ag.  This climate makes it impossible for the small organic farmer, in part because it interferes with the real costs of food to show up at supermarkets.   Without changing the way the USDA treats industrialized ag, artificially cheap food (propped up by subsidies and other support mechanisms) will continue to be cheap at the market while small farmers can barely keep their land, let alone pay themselves a decent wage.
If the USDA agrees that a “sin tax” on soda would result in a significant decline in obesity, why would they continue to, literally, subsidize it?
The average American child and adolescent gets 10-15% of their total calorie intake from beverages.  With more than a third of our children overweight or obese this is a major problem requiring a significant shift in policy and perspective...
The upcoming 2012 Farm Bill is the major battleground in which these issues will be fought over.  Many have argued the name changed to Food Bill because it is the primary instrument of the government to shape national food policy (think school lunch, food stamps, subsidies and so on.)   Changing the Farm Bill to include real food policies will make a difference for real people.
Sustainable Nutrition Bottom-line:  The vast majority of government support for ag in this country is geared toward big time, industrialized operations.  To review: subsidized corn and soy is turned into the vast quantities of processed foods and feed lot animal products that line our supermarket shelves.    What if we instead supported sound ag practices?  Like growing fruits and vegetables.  And pasturing animals.  Then supermarkets aisles might not be so crowded with cheap junk.  And the nations’ eaters might not be so sick.  


Tuesday, June 22, 2010

Endangered Apple Finds A Home

The concept of food biodiversity and it's essential role in health of people and planet has been explored here in past blog posts on this site.  All food groups have suffered loss of diversity at the hands of industrial agriculture, including the dear pomme. Read about the work we've been doing locally to help recover forgotten fruit on the Slow Food USA blog. And for more information about endangered foods of Southeast Wisconsin, check out Food Biodiversity.

Sunday, May 23, 2010

Gulf Grief

Image from Huffington Post slideshow of oil spill photos.

The BP oil spill warrants the growing outrage with its monstrous impact.  While most people I speak with are worried about how this will impact the price of gas, I’m worried about the price of fish.  Not about how it will affect my wallet, but what it means for ocean ecology as  hundreds of species are at risk.  Add this insult to the already injured—the Gulf of Mexico, an important biological, economic and gastronomic region, has not been thriving for quite some time.  The notorious dead zone, a hypoxic area the size of New Jersey created by Midwestern industrial ag fertilizer runoff carried to the Gulf via the mighty Mississippi, has already taken a toll on aquatic life and industry. Now, post oil spill, thousands of miles of Gulf waters are closed.

Who knows how this will affect seafood prices at your local grocery store.  Sources disagree as to how much of our nation’s fish intake comes from the Gulf catch; I’ve read as little as 1% and as high as one-third.  But certainly, we get most of our seafood from places far, far away.  Gulf shrimp is one of the many edible sea creatures that will certainly be affected by the spill, and unfortunately, Gulf shrimp is one of the few sustainable shrimp options.  Most of the shrimp eaten in the states come from places like the shrimp farms of Malaysia: where the factory like methods of raising shrimp degrade coastal habitats and communities.  (See the Environmental Justice foundations article: Farming the Sea - unregulated shrimp farming, the environment and people.)  Can we continue to export these ugly practices just so we can buy our seafood cheap?  

Even if the cost of shrimp doesn’t go up, this has cost us.  At the rate we are spoiling ecosystems and waterways it is becoming increasingly hard to support a growing population on this small planet.

Sustainable Nutrition Bottom-line: Finding sustainable seafood appears to be getting harder, but the nutrition benefits make it worth researching.  SlowFood USA recently stated in their monthly Food Chain, “We can also support the ongoing rebuilding of the Gulf and other regional seafood industries by making sure the seafood we buy is domestic and sustainably harvested.”  See past post: Finding Sustainable Seafood to learn more.  And if you’d like to get involved with relief efforts, consider supporting organizations like the Gulf Restoration Network.

Tuesday, May 18, 2010

Another Reason to Go Organic

                            Crop Dusting Helicopter-(Ironically Beautiful)

Not to be overly dramatic, but toxic chemicals in our food may be messing with our kid's heads.  

The newest addition to the growing list of reasons to choose organic food: high urinary organophosphate concentrations have been linked to twice the incidence of ADHD in children 8-15 years old.  Organophospates (OP), which are used in agriculture precisely because they attack the nervous system of insects, are known to accumulate in human tissues, though its often believed to be in low enough levels to not impact our health.  We are, afterall, a lot bigger than insects.  But if size matters, than wouldn't our children be the canaries in the coal mine?   A new study in the journal Pedriatrics, Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder and Urinary Metabolites of Organophosphate Pesticides, explores the high rates of ADHD and pesticide metabolites.   From the authors:
WHAT’S KNOWN ON THIS SUBJECT: Exposure to organophosphates has been associated with adverse effects on neurodevelopment, such as behavioral problems and lower cognitive function. Studies have focused, however, on populations with high levels of exposure, relative to the general population.

WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: We conducted a study with 1139 children 8 to 15 years of age, representative of the US population. The findings showed that children with higher urinary levels of organophosphate metabolites were more likely to meet the diagnostic criteria for ADHD.
So what does this mean for eaters?  Though this study has not shown a causal relationship (meaning we can't say that OPs cause ADHD) I do think it is better to be safe than sorry. I whole heartedly recommend choosing foods grown without toxic pesticides (or at least those grown without a lot of pesticides or those that are known to have lower residues of pesticides.)  The Environmental Working Group has published a list, called the Dirty Dozen, of the twelve typically most  contaminated fruits and veggies: peaches, strawberries, apples, domestic blueberries, nectarines, cherries, imported grapes, celery, sweet bell peppers, spinach, kale, collard greens and potatoes.  These foods would be best to buy organic or to grow naturally in your own garden plot. The foods found by the EWG to have the least pesticide residue, the Clean Fifteen, (sixteen are actually listed) are onions, sweet corn, sweet peas, asparagus, cabbage, eggplant, sweet potatoes, avocados, pineapples, mangoes, kiwi, domestic cantaloupe, watermelon, grapefruit and honeydew.

Sustainable Nutrition Bottom-line:  Eat your organic veggies and fruits and plenty of them!  For a clear explanation of what organic means and many more reasons why you might want to choose organic, read the past blog post, "Is Organic Better for You?".  For those folks who don't have the extra money for pesticide free food at the market, consider growing your own.  Check out Kitchen Gardeners International or the Milwaukee's own Victory Garden Initiative for more information and gardening resources.


Thursday, April 22, 2010

Earth Day 2010


Earlier today, someone asked me what they could do to celebrate Earth Day. I responded, "Planting a tree or giving up factory farmed meat for a day (or forever) would be a good place to start."  Then I found this brilliantly begun message in my inbox and felt I had to pass it on....

Dear Jennifer,
You are destroying the ocean. We all are. We're polluting oceans with plastic waste and chemicals, we're overfishing, and we're causing climate change to warm and acidify our ocean waters.
But this Earth Day, you can do something about it. Since we are the problem, we can also be the solution. We can change our habits and protect our oceans forever.
We've partnered with our friends at Participant Media, the entertainment company behind such films as An Inconvenient Truth and Oceans, to help start a movement of people dedicated to taking simple steps to reduce three of the main threats to oceans: plastic waste, overfishing and climate change.
Here are the three most important steps you can take to help protect our oceans:
1. Choose reusable bottles and bags instead of plastic ones. Americans together use 2.5 million plastic bottles every hour and each use 500 plastic bags annually. These can take anywhere from 1,000 to 1 million years to degrade, and are why plastic constitutes 90% of all trash floating on the ocean's surface.
2. Eat non-endangered seafood. Due to our over-consumption of seafood, 90% of the world's large fish, such as tuna, swordfish, flounder and sharks have been killed in the past 50 years. If we continue at our current rates, all salt-water fish could be extinct by 2048.
3. Reduce your carbon footprint. Carbon intensive activities such as driving, flying, and inefficient home heating are warming ocean waters, which could be catastrophic for millions of ocean species unable to adapt to higher temperatures. The extinction of any number of these species could in turn cause a collapse of the marine food chain, affecting everything from plankton to polar bears.
We can change all this by together changing our own individual behavior. Together we can ensure healthy, clean oceans for future generations. It all starts with people like us deciding to make small changes that can have a big impact.
Thank you for taking a stand,

– The Change.org Team in partnership with Participant Media

Sustainable Nutrition Bottom-line:  There are many ways to celebrate Earth Day with good food.  If you need more ideas, check out last year's post Eating Green for Earth Day.

Monday, April 19, 2010

smaller = < climate change


"Can we imagine smaller?"  Bill McKibben, author of Deep Economy, The End of Nature, and now Eaarth, asked in talk last Friday night at the Urban Ecology Center.

Smaller, as opposed to business as usual, is what it will take to mitigate the very worst effects of global warming.  Smaller seems revolutionary, but as we are already running into the limits of growth, what is really radical is not doing anything.  Smaller is necessary to slow down the heartbreaking losses related to climate change that are already occurring: the arctic melting, island nations disappearing, glacial water supplies being lost faster than they can be replaced, extinction of species, increased flooding & stronger storms.  "We are not allowed to bet on this," said Bill.  We are not allowed to gamble away the things we collectively need and love as humans.

Bill explained how we have already "built a new" planet in the past 200 years of burning fossil fuels, releasing carbon into the atmosphere that took millions of years to lay down.  The result: the earth's temperature has been raised by one full degree, there is 5% more moisture in the atmosphere, and 30% increase in oceanic acidity.  Each of these changes has led to myriad of problems, as mentioned, but the things that make it seem real to us are the stories with which we can identify.  In the face of all the dramatic stories, I was surprised how deeply I was saddened when Bill shared, very matter of factly while he was really talking about something else, that his home state of Vermont (once my home state) is losing their maple trees.  Just imagine; no sugar on snow.

Many people, especially leaders of large nations such as ours (as evidenced by the outcome of Copenhagen,) are in a state of denial, but the science is clear: it's real, we've caused it, and we need to take some drastic actions now.  The safe level of carbon in the atmosphere is 350 parts per million (ppm), as found by leading climate scientist Jim Hansen and his team (tipped off when the arctic started melting in 2007.)  We're now at 387ppm.

Enter the 350 campaign.  Bill Mckibben and a few grad students have started a global campaign to draw attention to climate change.  350.org is home to a global network of citizens of the earth concerned about the present and the future.  October 24, 2009, the international day of action on Climate Change,  was reported by CNN the most widespread day of political action in the planet's history.  Go to 350.org to see thousands of pictures of people from every continent taking action.  Maybe you'll see the photo of the Bangladeshi orphans who apparently sent a not along with their photo that said something like, "even though no one cares for us, we care about the earth."  The environmental movement is often seen as elitest, but Bill made the (too often missed) point that those with the least resources suffer the worst from environmental disasters; climate change is no different.

The 350 campaign has announced 10/10/10 as a Global Work Day.   From the website:

2010 is the year we
Get To Work.

With ideas and input from thousands of organizers from around the world, we've formed a climate action plan for 2010.
We'll get to work to start changing our communities, and get to work to make our leaders realize that they actually need to lead. It's a plan that may well break the logjam and get us moving. But only, of course, if we work together to make it happen.

What will you do in your community?

One final point that resonated with me and I think is important for us all to think about.  When asked about personal lifestyles, Bill responded by talking about how our choices do matter, but that we should be, "saving some of the energy we use to perfect our own lives" to get political.  Global warming is a global problem.  The 350 campaign is a way to move world leaders to the end result of putting a price on carbon to reduce emissions significantly everywhere.


Sustainable Nutrition Bottom-line:  The food system accounts for an estimated 20% of carbon emissions.  See past blog posts Changing Climate Change, Industrial Nutrition, and 50% Less Meat, and for ideas on low-carbon diets.  Changing our food system to one that emits less doesn't have to be all drudgery either.  One study found that people, on average have ten times more conversations while shopping at a farmer's market than while at the supermarket.  I'd love to see a study exploring how much more famer's market shoppers enjoy their local, fresh food too:)

Saturday, April 3, 2010

Jamie's Food Revolution



If you haven't yet seen British chef Jamie Oliver's new reality show, Jamie's Food Revolution, about trying to change school meals in one of the unhealthiest places in America, you can watch full episodes on ABC.com.  It's worth a watch: his earnest desire to help a town combat its alarming rates of overweight and obesity by serving real food instead of processed food at school stirs up mixed responses from residents.  While Huntington, WV has been singled out due to a CDC report that named it the most obese city in the country, its eating habits, its school lunch, and its public health picture is found in the towns and cities across America.    Jamie's show uncovers some of the shocking realities of school lunch, like french fries counting as a serving of vegetables.  It also puts a face to the "obesity epidemic" by featuring residents whose lives have been severely impacted by obesity. 

Jamie (and viewers) may not realize that there is a long standing grass roots food movement in America, one arm aimed directly at improving school lunch.  He might have a better chance of success if he calls on the expertise of people like Ann Cooper, the Renegade Lunch Lady, and Chef Greg Christian of Chicago's Organic School Project.

My hope is that the show will get more people involved in ongoing projects to improve school food or to start their own project.  A starting point may be to find out about a school's (federally mandated) wellness policy.

Sustainable Nutrition Bottom-line:  Kids do spend a large amount of time at school and the food served there has a dramatic impact on their overall diet quality.  School lunch funding is not adequate to serve quality meals.  The federal Childhood Nutrition Act, which regulates the school food spending, is being reauthorized and so this is an important opportunity for change.  Let your congress people know you support healthier food in schools. Learn more at Slow Food USA's campaign for good food in schools website: Time for Lunch.

Tuesday, March 30, 2010

Food Biodiversity


Food biodiversity (variation of life forms within the food system) is essential for good nutrition and global food security.  Traditionally, humans have relied on a wide diversity of plants and animal species foods.  Today over 98% of foods have disappeared or are at loss of disappearing. This is due to a multiplicity of factors; our industrialized food system has been built on principles of uniformity and effieciency.  The result is our monocrop agriculture has led to monocrop diets.  People have little variety in their diets, with a few varieties of corn, soy, and meat filling the national appetite for convenient and cheap meals, but our health is suffering.

The United Nations has declared 2010 as the International Year of Biodiversity.  It's time recognize the extent and the scope of the problem and find a way forward.  

Joining the many initiatives working to protect and preserve agricultural biodiversity worldwide (such as the Slow Food Foundation for Biodiversity and the Food and Agriculture Organization) is a local educational effort to promote at risk foods linked to Southeast Wisconsin.  Building off the work of Slow Food USA and its RAFT Alliance and Ark of Taste, is Endangered Food of SE Wisconsin.

Sustainable Nutrition Bottomline: To be a bit kitchy--variety is the spice of life.  But in all seriousness, the wide variety of food traditions that is our human heritage can help us to address the epidemic of obesity, diabetes, and heart disease and offer alternatives to the current food system's destructive effects on the environment and our communities.

Monday, March 8, 2010

Grains

This post is part of a series exploring the primary environmental and health issues in a particular food group.



Bread made from Turkey Hard Red Winter Wheat, an heirloom grain on Slow Food's Ark of Taste.



The cultivation of grains can arguably be called the most influential happening in the history of human kind. When the farming of cereals began, so did civilization.

Grains are an important part of a healthy diet, but much of the grain we eat today is in a refined form and heavily processed to offer us little of the nutritional benefits of whole grains. And much of this grain is grown unsustainably, profiting only agribusiness, with the ecosystem, family farmers, and eaters reaping little reward.

The Health Benefits of Whole Grains


Whole grains like whole wheat, rye, barley, spelt, oats, stone ground cornmeal, brown rice, wild rice, quinoa, popcorn, buckwheat, teff and millet support wellness. In their intact form, grains provide carbohydrates, dietary fiber, vitamins, minerals, lignans, phytoestrogens, and phenolic compounds. When the outer bran and inner germ of the grain seed kernel are removed, as in the case of white bread and white rice and the like, we are left with solely the starchy endosperm. Stripped of the rich B vitamins and antioxidants of the germ, and the fiber of the bran, carbohydrate is the primary nutrient left. In refining, the whole grain easily goes from a nutrient dense food to a source of empty calories.

The Dietary Guidelines for American’s recommendation is to “Make half your grains whole.” At least. The DGA’s go on to say, “Consuming at least 3 or more ounce-equivalents of whole grains per day can reduce the risk of several chronic diseases and may help with weight maintenance.” The benefits of whole grains stretch from reduced risk of certain cancers to lowered cholesterol to improved gastrointestinal functioning. Whole grains have been found to reduce the postprandial blood sugar surge and to increase satiety; these effects can aid in improved diabetes control as well as weight control.

The ever popular refined white flour, pasta, rice, cereals, snack foods, and sweets can be eaten without the negative consequences of high blood sugar or chronic weight gain, but the amount of these refined grain we eat as American’s is way too much for our own good and too often is joined by added sugars, fat, and sodium; contributing to higher risk of weight increases, heart disease, and type 2 diabetes. People who choose to eat whole grains at most meals reduce their risk of these problems. Unfortunately, there is confusion about what constitutes a whole grain, so here are some tips to help identify whole grains:

Ø Check the ingredient label as described above: the first ingredient should be a whole grain.

Ø Look for the grams of fiber listed on the Nutrition Facts Label: a good source of whole grains will have a higher fiber content. A good rule of thumb is to look for 3 grams of fiber for each serving, like a one ounce slice of bread.

Ø Watch for the whole grain council label. This is voluntary labeling so while anything with the whole grain stamp will be a source of whole grains, not every whole grain has a stamp.

Ø Buy raw whole grain ingredients from the bulk bins or directly from a farm or mill. Steel cut and rolled oats, whole wheat berries and flour, quinoa, wild rice, or brown rice are all clearly whole grains.

A Step Towards Sustainable Choices

If eating whole grains helps protect your own health, then choosing local and organic whole grains is a step towards protecting the health of the planet.

Locally grown grains can reduce transportation emissions as well as support your local and regional farmers. Organic grains are grown without synthetic fertilizers, herbicides and fungicides, toxic pesticides, sewage sludge, and are not genetically engineered. Both reduced transportation and reduced chemical use helps to reduce toxic runoff into our increasingly susceptible waterways. The run off from the industrial farms of the Midwest drains into the Mississippi River and is one of the major contributors to the notorious “dead zone” in the Gulf of Mexico—an area the size of New Jersey in which life has basically been suffocated; destroying biodiversity and the livelihood of many of the Gulf’s fishing communities. Closer to home, organic farming allows for more life to flourish on the farm and in nearby ecosystems like birds, bees, and small mammals.

Organic foods, by law, cannot contain any GMO ingredients, which is useful to those consumers looking to avoid GMOs because they are not labeled in this country. GMOs, Genetically Modified Organisms, are defined as “organisms with manipulated genes to introduce new, or alter existing, characteristics, or produce a new protein or enzyme” by Food Processing Technology. The biotech industry promotes GMOs as the answer to just about everything, but especially to feeding the world’s growing population while solving our environmental crises. But there is much reason to be skeptical about the claims of this very controversial industry. Around the world, people are protesting GMOs for environmental, food sovereignty, health, cross contamination concerns, and more.
“Agricultural biotechnology has been promoted as the key tool to combat global hunger and poverty by increasing the productivity of farmers worldwide...The biotechnology industry promised that farmers could increase their yields, lower production costs and reduce agrochemical use. Instead, American farmers have faced higher costs without higher productivity, risked law suits from seed companies, and applied more agrochemicals as weeds and insects have developed resistance to the genetic crop traits.” - Food and Water Watch
While the biotech industry courts favor with high level players interested in solving world hunger, it is important to keep in mind that hunger stems from the inability to afford food, not lack of food in the global supply. While global hunger increases, large agro-companies like Monsanto and Cargill are making record profits. Even the American Dietetic Association, a fairly conservative and industry friendly organization, acknowledges there may be a problem with biotech. While the 2007 ADA Position Paper on Sustainability states, “ADA affirms that food biotechnology has many potentially positive applications,” the paper goes on to say, “genetically engineered seeds present some significant contradictions regarding ecological sustainability.”

The ADA shows no concern over the potential human health impacts of GMO consumption, though certainly there have been cases of novel allergens introduced into foods like corn and kiwi. To date, there are no long-term studies that can show us that the regular consumption of the most commonly eaten GMO foods (corn, soy, canola, and cottonseed oil) is absolutely safe. We will find out someday as most Americans are now eating GMO foods on a daily basis.

At its most basic level, the fundamental problem with biotechnology seems to be that it perpetuates an industrial paradigm that furthers the pollution of our waterways and leaves the soil bereft of nutrients, requiring huge inputs of fertilizer to grow anything at all. This is no way to move forward in the face of climate change in a world of finite resources.

Finding Good Whole Grains

Local sources of grains can be found in much of the U.S. When Milwaukee’s Eat Local Challenge began a few years ago, we sought out local sources of every food we could, but had some difficulty finding local wheat. We found some freshly milled wheat flour in a farm store at the Michael Fields Agricultural Institute, but that required a 45 minute drive from the city—not all that environmentally friendly.

Since that first ELC in 2007, the market for local grains seems to have expanded; now we can buy organic whole wheat flour from Illinois at our local Co-op, we can find rolled oats at our farmers market’s year round, and one of our farmer friends shared a pound of wheat berries he grew in his nearby fields last year. The ability to find one of our region's indigenous foods, wild rice, has expanded as well. A few years back, it seemed you had to know someone, travel “up north” where wild rice grows, or special order it from the White Earth Reservation in Minnesota--where the tribe protects and maintains the sacred wild rice, known as Manoomin in Ojibwe. Now, we can purchase real wild rice from Wisconisn at a local “Trading Post” or the White Earth Wild Rice is now easily from the Outpost Co-op.

Another Great Lakes food tradition is the White Corn tended by the Oneida Nation of Wisconsin. Originally from the New York area, tribal members brought Iroquois White Corn with them when they migrated to Wisconsin as their land was taken by colonists. White Corn is eaten primarily as a grain in its dried form (when fresh it’s known as “green corn.”) It is enjoyed in White Corn Soup or as a wheelshaped delicious cornmeal bread, studded with kidney beans, known as Kanastohale. Each year at the Oneida organic farm Tsyunhehkw^, elders, youth and adults come together for the Community Harvest and Husking Bee—a tradition that has been carried on for generations.

Growing your own grain is also a possibility. While wheat, rye, or barley may be a challenge if you do not have much land or a thresher, it’s pretty simple to grow a row of grain corn in your backyard. This past year, partner grew Pennsylvania Dutch Heirloom Corn for popcorn and Hopi Blue Corn for flour. We now have a few quarts of beautiful grey-blue cornmeal, ground on a friend’s borrowed mill attached to their food processor.

Sustainable Nutrition Bottom-line:

Eat whole grains for your own health. Choose organically and locally grown grains for the health of the planet and of future generations. There is a continuum of food choices within any food group: at one end of the Grains continuum, you may find heavily processed foods like snack cakes and white bread and on the other end you may find locally grown, organic oats, homegrown corn, and real wild rice. Though the reasons to choose well are plenty, change does not easily happen overnight; take small steps in the direction you'd like to go. Wherever you are on the continuum, there is room to grow. If you currently eat white bread regularly, consider switching to whole grain bread. If you currently eat whole grain bread, but don’t cook, try making wild rice, brown rice, quinoa, or barley for dinner two or three times this week. If you eat and cook whole grains regularly, it might be time to seek out local sources at your farmers market or on localharvest.org.

Tuesday, February 23, 2010

Science and Public Health Take a Good Look at the Food System

February has been ripe with discourse about the transforming the food system to one that can feed the world equitably and healthfully while mitigating the effects of climate change and environmental degradation.

On Feb 12, a special edition of the journal Science devoted to the question of feeding a growing population with finite resources was made available online for free.  I’ve just begun getting through pieces like Food Security: The Challenge of Feeding 9 Billion People, What It Takes to Make That Meal, Measuring Food Insecurity, and Sustainability and Global Seafood, but I can wholeheartedly recommend it as an important resource for those interested in taking a serious look at our global public health and environmental crises and considering the solutions. The introductory article Feeding the Future starts off dramatically:
Feeding the 9 billion people expected to inhabit our planet by 2050 will be an unprecedented challenge. This special issue examines the obstacles to achieving global food security and some promising solutions…. We have little time to waste. Godfray et al. (p. 812) note that we have perhaps 40 years to radically transform agriculture, work out how to grow more food without exacerbating environmental problems, and simultaneously cope with climate change. Although estimates of food insecurity vary (Barrett et al., p. 825), the number of undernourished people already exceeds 1 billion; feeding this many people requires more than incremental changes (Federoff et al., p. 833).

Then last week, the Institute for Healthcare Improvement sponsored a web program in their WIHI series, titled  “ Tipping the Scales: Fresh Ideas to Combat Obesity.”   The program focused on our food environment and it’s impact on our food intake.   In it, I was impressed to hear Dr David Kessler former FDA Commissioner and author of The End of Overeating say, “Unless we dramatically change our relationship with food, including the environment..” ...the epidemic of obesity will go unresolved.  Then Charles J. Homer, MD, MPH, said, “overweight is not a matter of personal choice…we live in a toxic environment and we need to change it.”   And Rachelle Mirkin of the National Initiative for Children’s Healthcare Quality talked about how a big, systemic change will be needed to make a difference in the epidemic of obesity.   She said, that for “real change” to happen, “we’re going to need to change the environment.” 

And today  an exciting webinar on Bridging Food Systems and Public Health was aired. The hosts promised it would be available online tomorrow.  For now you can access the special issues of the Journal of Hunger and Environmental Nutrition  that the webinar explored: Food Systems and Public Health: Linkages to Achieve Healthier Diets and Healthier Communities.  David Wallinga, MD, MPA, of the Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy, Michael Hamm, PhD, of Michigan State University, and Angie Tagtow, MS, RD, LD, HEN/ADA Managing Editor were the featured speakers.  I can’t say enough about this webinar.  Not only did the speakers address opportunities for positive changes in local and federal policy and ways for health professionals to “dig in”, they shared visions of what a healthy and sustainable food system might actually look like.

Sustainable Nutrition Bottom-line:  Our environmental and public health crises intersect in the food system.  And there is a lot of work to be done to tackle these crises.  I loved when Michael Hamm of the JHEN webinar defined our food system challenges as a “wicked problem”--a problem that is "difficult or impossible to fix…. because of complex interdependencies.”  But in acknowledging the scope of the problem we should not give up.   Each and every one of us has opportunities to make positive changes on the individual, local, nationwide and global level.  If we find ways to act quickly and act together to support good policies that can help us to change our collective and individual foodways, we just might be able to create an equitable, healthy, and sustainable food system.

Thursday, February 11, 2010

America's Move to Raise a Healthier Generation

This week Michelle Obama helped launch a national campaign to fight childhood obesity—Let’s  Move: America’s Move to Raise a Healthier Generation of Kids

What's refreshing about this high profile initiative is that it not only includes a focus on Healthier Choices and Physical Activity but also Healthier Food in Schools and Healthy Food Access.  This moves the issue of healthy food access (or food insecurity) from what some might call the fringe to the spotlight.  Though healthy food insecurity has long been recognized as a problem in public health and community activist circles, this increased attention, funding, and acknowledgment that obesity is tied to lack of healthy food access may have positive results.  With Will Allen of Milwaukee’s very own Growing Power and many other high profile Americans including the president of the American Acadamy of Pediatrics at her side, the first lady outlined the program priorities.

From the Let’s Move Website: 
Accessing Healthy, Affordable Food
More than 23 million Americans, including 6.5 million children, live in low-income urban and rural neighborhoods that are more than a mile from a supermarket. These communities, where access to affordable, quality, and nutritious foods is limited, are known as food deserts.  Lack of access is one reason why many children are not eating recommended levels of fruits, vegetables, and whole grains. And food insecurity and hunger among children is widespread.  A recent USDA report showed that in 2008, an estimated 49.1 million people, including 16.7 million children, lived in households that experienced hunger multiple times throughout the year. The Administration, through new federal investments and the creation of public private partnerships, will: 
  • Eliminate Food Deserts:  As part of the President’s proposed FY 2011 budget, the Administration announced the new Healthy Food Financing Initiative – a partnership between the U.S. Departments of Treasury, Agriculture and Health and Human Services that will invest $400 million a year to help bring grocery stores to underserved areas and help places such as convenience stores and bodegas carry healthier food options.  Through these initiatives and private sector engagement, the Administration will work to eliminate food deserts across the country within seven years. 
  • Increase Farmers Markets: The President’s 2011 Budget proposes an additional $5 million investment in the Farmers Market Promotion Program at the U.S. Department of Agriculture which provides grants to establish, and improve access to, farmers markets.
The initiative goals also include Healthier Food in Schools.  Again, from the Let’s Move website:
Serving Healthier Food in Schools 
Many children consume as many as half of their daily calories at school.  As families work to ensure that kids eat right and have active play at home, we also need to ensure our kids have access to healthy meals in their schools.  With more than 31 million children participating in the National School Lunch Program and more than 11 million participating in the National School Breakfast Program, good nutrition at school is more important than ever.  Together with the private sector and the non-profit community, we will take the following steps to get healthier food in our nation’s schools:   
  • Reauthorize the Child Nutrition Act: The Administration is requesting an historic investment of an additional $10 billion over ten years starting in 2011 to improve the quality of the National School Lunch and Breakfast program, increase the number of kids participating, and ensure schools have the resources they need to make program changes, including training for school food service workers, upgraded kitchen equipment, and additional funding for meal reimbursements.  With this investment, additional fruits, vegetables, whole grains, and low-fat dairy products will be served in our school cafeterias and an additional one million students will be served in the next five years.   
Slow Food USA has been addressing the poor quality of US school lunches with it’s Time for Lunch Campaign since early last year—you may remember a blog post about labor day “Eat Ins” to call attention to the issue.   In a press release on Feb 9th, Slow Food USA’s president pointed out that while this additional $10 billion is progress, it is not nearly enough in the grand scheme of things:
“President Obama’s proposal to add $1 billion per year to the Child Nutrition Act is an important step forward,” stated Josh Viertel, president, Slow Food USA. “But, it’s not enough to give America’s kids a healthy future, especially when nearly one third of our children are overweight or obese and when Congress spends at least $13 billion per year subsidizing the production of unhealthy processed foods. The public needs to speak up and tell Congress to make real improvements to school lunch.”
Sustainable Nutrition Bottom-line:   The burden of obesity does not lie solely, or even mostly, with personal choice.  A large body of research points to the powerful role the environment plays in our personal habits.  The socio-ecomonic model of health places the individual and their own modifiable layers of influence (things they have control over) within a sea of influences:  living and working conditions, agriculture and food supplies, education, access to good and services like healthcare and water and sanitation, and the overall economic, cultural and environmental influences. With this model, we can see that the burden of obesity lies within our society.  The changes in our way of life over the last few generations has re-shaped us, literally.

My practice affords me the opportunity to talk with parents and kids struggling with childhood obesity (and diabetes, hypercholesterolemia and hypertension.)   What I see in my conversations with these families are the same problems, over and over, stemming from a food system in disarray.  The barriers people have to overcome to resist or reduce obesity are overwhelming—which is why we have such a problem in the first place.  Yes, guardians should ensure their kids have daily active play, wholesome snacks, plenty of water, and the chance to sit down at the table together often for meals, but if we do not make drastic changes to the way we nourish ourselves en masse, the epidemic of obesity will only get worse until we run our of land, food, or resources.   The more resources, programs, initiatives, and so on we can use to provide sustainable real food to real kids, the better chances our kids will have at living long, healthy lives to face the challenges ahead.  So this initiative, Let’s Move, seems to provide a ray of hope in a worrisome time…

Thursday, January 28, 2010

WIll Real Food Experience the Oprah Effect?



Yesterday, Michael Pollan gave Oprah fans a clear explanation of the common western diet when he defined it as, "lots of processed foods and meat, lots of added fat and sugar, lots of everything...except fruits, vegetables, and whole grains."   He went on to say, "before the Western diet...around the turn of the last century...populations did not have high levels of heart disease, type 2 diabetes, obesity..."  

The western diet, the only diet known to cause chronic disease, is full of empty calories (lots of calories with little or no nutrition.)  And it's brought to us by corporations using unsustainable means. 

So how do we remedy this?  Pollan explains that it's simple in his new book "Food Rules."  "It's all about whole foods," he said on the show (whole foods meaning minimally processed foods, not the store) and he's right. 

While the nutrition industry has rightly been accussed of confusing eaters with nutritionism which can praise or vilify a nutrient from one year to the next, many dietitains have been espousing this same sort of simple advice for decades.  "Eat a well balanced diet by choosing a wide variety of foods from each food group," is standard dietitian speak.  However, it hasn't been so easy to translate.  Michael Pollan, Mr "Eat Food.  Mostly Plants. Not too Much,"  translates this message better than just about anyone else.  And now he's done it on Oprah.

Saturday, January 16, 2010

NY Times Article: Pink Slime Beef

Back in December, the New York Times published it's article on beef processing, Safety of Beef Processing Method Is Questioned, and people have been rethinking their consumption of ground beef ever since. In a shortsighted industry solution to an industry problem of E. coli and salmonella, a major meat processor has been using ammonia (a substance classified by EU as "irritant", "corrosive", or danger to the environment" dependent on it's concentration) in an effort to kill pathogens without actually reducing levels of contamination in beef. This processed beef-like substance, referred to as "pink slime," has made it's way into the majority of fast food burgers and into school lunches. Grist.org food editor Tom Philpott wrote a predictably smart and angry piece in response. From his Lessons on the food system from the ammonia hamburger fiasco:
To make a long story short: Beef Products buys the cheapest, least desirable beef on offer—fatty sweepings from the slaughterhouse floor, which are notoriously rife with pathogens like E. coli 0157 and antibiotic-resistant salmonella. It sends the scraps through a series of machines, grinds them into a paste, separates out the fat, and laces the substance with ammonia to kill pathogens.

Sustainable Nutrition Bottom-line: Pink slime, of course, is not healthy for us or the planet. Factory farmed beef is the largest environmental polluter in the food system (see previous posts Changing Climate Change or Meat's Deep Eco Footprint ) and the end product is high in saturated fat and goodness knows what else. A better choice for dinner would be grass fed beef or bison—higher in healthy fats like omega 3 and conjugated linoleic acid. Or choose beans—inexpensive, high in protein, fiber, and antioxidants, and low in fat and impact.